The Vegetarian by Han Kang

I wasn’t at all sure that I was going to read Han Kang’s The Vegetarian.  Even when it popped up in review after review on blogs I follow, I still wasn’t sure.  Once I began reading it, I still wasn’t sure that I’d even finish it.  And now that I’ve read it, I’m still not sure what I think about it.  Despite all of that uncertainty, I’m genuinely glad that I read it, and find it one of the most thought-provoking books I’ve ever read.

I worried that it might be too disturbing for me to handle.  It certainly wasn’t a pleasurable reading experience for me, but it was too strange, too different from the things I normally read, to put down.  If I’m honest, the short length (188 pages) helped .  As did the fact that I’m almost certain it will be a Tournament of Books pick next year.  But the spare elegance of Kang’s writing kept me turning pages.56abcc1b1f00007f00216f6a

It’s told in three sections, which were apparently published in South Korea as three novellas.  Yeong-hye, a young, married woman is the center of this story, but she does not really get to tell her own tale.  There are italicized passages here and there that are probably told from her point of view, but they are infrequent.  The first section is told from the point of view of her husband, Mr. Cheong.  He’s a real… well, I’m thinking of a crass word to describe him.  There is nothing whatsoever appealing about him.  He basically married Yeong-hye because she was so unremarkable and demanded so little from him.  When she has a terrible dream and decides to becomes a vegetarian, she is rocking his orderly, boring, controlled life.  She shocks and angers her family as well, and there is a violent scene at a family dinner that is really hard to read.

The second section is told from her brother-in-law’s point of view, and it’s disturbing in a totally different way.  He is sexually obsessed with her, and wants to use her as a model in his video art installation.  This section is interesting in that Yeong-hye seems to subvert her brother-in-law’s desires and claim her own power in the midst of his objectification.  However, her gradual descent into madness, which has been building throughout the whole novel, is unchecked.

The third section was the strongest for me, the one that finally awakened me emotions and locked me into the flow of the narrative.  It’s told from the point of view of her sister, In-hye, and it’s some time later after the events of the second part.  Yeong-hye has deteriorated drastically, both mentally and physically, and she is in a mental hospital.  We learn more about In-hye and how their family life may have informed each of the sister’s life paths.  There is some gorgeous writing in this section, like this passage:

She was no longer able to cope with all that her sister reminded her of.  She’d been unable to forgive her for soaring alone over a boundary she herself could never bring herself to cross, unable to forgive that magnificent irresponsibility that had enabled Yeong-hye to shuck off social constraints and leave her behind, still a prisoner.  And before Yeong-hye had broken those bars, she’d never even known they were there.

I was deeply moved by the final section, so much so that it made me reconsider the novel as a whole.  I was finally able to push against my discomfort and appreciate what I think this novel is trying to explore.  For me, it is about family, and expectations, both familial and societal, especially for women.  It’s about choice and desire, how free one person can truly ever be to create the life they want to live, for themselves without hurting or angering or disappointing the people around them.  At least that’s what I emerged with from my reading of this bizarre, haunting, remarkable book.

The Vegetarian would make a killer book for your book group – one could talk about it for hours.  I’m really glad I read it, even though it was not an easy read.I haven’t yet rated this novel on Goodreads with a star rating.  I usually find it pretty easy to assign stars: three for “I liked it,” two for “it was okay,” four for “REALLY good.”  I don’t think this is the kind of novel that is suited for that system.  It really is something totally of its own, and to give it a star rating would almost diminish its odd terror and beauty.




18 thoughts on “The Vegetarian by Han Kang

  1. Great review! Like you, I’ve seen lots of reviews of it, but I’ve also been unsure whether to tackle it or not. Your review makes me think that, difficult read though it might be, it would be worth it. I don’t think I’ve ever read a book set in Korea before, much less one written by a Korean. Plus the 188 page length sounds good… 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This has been on my radar, especially when a friend said it ruined calamari for her indefinitely. Awesome review! Didn’t realize it was so short—more incentive to try to squeeze it in.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you, Eve. Oh man, there are some passages that might make you a bit squeamish about any meat. Probably most in the first section and then the focus is not so much on food. It was a really wild book, unlike just about anything I’ve ever read.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I love your intro to this post. That’s EXACTLY where I am with this book only I still haven’t read it, because I was so unsure about it, despite seeing it everywhere. Still, when you say it’s disturbing and written by a South Korean (how did I not know this)- that, and you writing you’re still glad you read it = I will put this on my list. Thank you for a wonderful review as always 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  4. It’s an amazing book, isn’t it? I want to say I loved it but that doesn’t seem right given how uncomfortable and disquieting it is. I liked the third part of the book best too. The whole sisters thing really got to me and the writing in this section was so beautiful. And oh my gosh, that family dinner scene you refer to at the beginning! Horrifying!


  5. I’m glad you read the book too!
    I genuinely enjoyed the book for what it was, knowing full well when I got it that it would be disturbing and dark. But that never turns me a way for a book, it does the opposite.
    I’m not sure which of the parts I enjoyed most, but the one about the brother-in-law was the eeriest for me. Part 3 was just depressing. What else should I have expected?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You are a more fearless reader than I, Naz! 🙂 Yes, the brother-in-law part as just… gross. And part 3 for me was where I became emotionally connected to her sister – I felt like she was the most accessible of all the characters in the novel. So much to think about with this novel!


  6. Ahhh “which were apparently published in South Korea as three novellas. ” – things make so much sense now!! This weird structure was really a big point of what made me like but not love this book! The other was that I loved part one and wanted the book to go into the whole female empowerment through food etc direction and felt like I was in at least 3 different movies as I read on 🙂 Kudos to the narrators though, cause I really enjoyed the audiobook version.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s